Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • About Bonfire
Miguel Afonso Caetano
@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org  ·  activity timestamp 10 hours ago

"The Trump administration recently published the US National Security Strategy. It’s an extremely important document. It’s an official outline of US priorities in the world, normally published only once every Presidental term. But this time, it’s published at a time of high geopolitical tensions, making it perhaps the most important National Security Strategy this century.

What struck me as most notable with the report is its profound irony. It denounces three decades of American attempts at global domination while articulating a vision of American supremacy more explicit, unapologetic, and comprehensive than perhaps any strategy document since the early Cold War. The strategy condemns the hubris of post-1991 efforts at “permanent American domination of the entire world,” yet it unabashedly demands exclusive preeminence in Latin America, military supremacy throughout the Indo-Pacific, control over critical supply chains, and the right to dictate terms to allies on defence spending and trade policy.

This is not a strategy of restraint or humility. It is suffused with American exceptionalism, asserting that the United States must remain “the world’s strongest, richest, most powerful, and most successful country for decades to come.”"

https://www.theglobalcurrents.com/p/trumps-national-security-strategy

#USA #Trump #NationalSecurity #AmericanExceptionalism #Imperialism #Neocolonialism #LatinAmerica

Trump's National Security Strategy calls for more global domination

The Trump administration wants to replace liberal internationalism with explicit economic and regional dominance
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Miguel Afonso Caetano
@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 9 hours ago

"The central irony of Trump’s 2025 National Security Strategy is profound: it condemns the post-Cold War pursuit of “permanent American domination of the entire world” while demanding American supremacy more explicitly than perhaps any strategy document since the early Cold War. The Bush, Clinton, and Obama strategies at least gestured toward multilateralism and partnership, justifying American power through universalist claims about democracy and rules-based order. This strategy dispenses with such pretenses entirely. It represents a move from liberal internationalist domination to nationalist domination.

The document’s lack of international humility is striking. Other nations should “put their interests first,” but only when aligned with American preferences. The strategy proclaims respect for other nations’ “differing cultures and governing systems” while declaring European civilization faces erasure and Latin American countries must restructure their economies to serve American supply chains. There is no acknowledgment that allies might have valid reasons for diversifying partnerships.

Whether this vision is sustainable depends on assumptions the strategy never questions: that allies will increase defence spending without seeking corresponding influence."

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

Bonfire community

This is a bonfire demo instance for testing purposes

btfree.social: About · Code of conduct · Privacy ·
Bonfire community · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Public Groups
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login