YUUlUuSE, ICur WIC Ur vC дуии, 10о-у.
61. Johnson, "BBC 'Misrepresented' Covid Risk."
62. The Supreme Court in Murthy v. Missouri declined to rule on the merits of the case, holding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring suit.
63. Missouri v. Biden, 83 F. 4th 350, 359 (sth Cir. 2023).
64. Missouri v. Biden, 382.
65. Yoel Roth, "Getting the Facts Straight: Some Observations on the Fifth Circuit Ruling in Missouri v. Biden," Jawboning (blog), Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Uni-versity, September 27, 2023, https://knightcolumbia.org/blog/getting-the-facts-straight-some
-observations-on-the-fifth-circuit-ruling-in-missouri-v-biden-1.
66. Missouri v. Biden, 362.
67. Missouri v. Biden, 367.
68. Missouri v. Biden, 371-72.
324 NOTES TO CHAPTER 4
69. Missouri v. Biden, 366.
70. Missouri v. Biden, 372.
71. Cited in John H. Cochrane, "Atlas Agonistes," The Grumpy Economist, September 15, 2020, https://johnhcochrane.blogspot.com/2020/09/altas-agonistes.html.
72. Woolhouse, Year the World Went Mad, 220.
73. Anderberg, The Herd, 185.
74. @unusual_whales, "Mark Zuckerberg of Meta on Covid censoring," X, June 11, 2023, 10:01 p.m., https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1668075898539585537.
75. See Paul D. Thacker, "NEW EMAILS: Biden White House Behind Facebook Censorship of the BMJ's Pfizer Investigation," Disinformation Chronicle, January 17, 2023; see Paul D. Thacker,
"NEW EMAILS," X, January 17, 2023, https://x.com/thackerpd/status/1615322067510886403
?lang-en.
76. Missouri v. Biden, U.S. Dist. Ct., West. Dist. of La., Case 3:22-Cv-01213, 07/04/23, 129 fn.
655, https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/missouri-v-biden-ruling.pdf.