@_elena Came across yesterday with my first thread on Mastodon, in which a techbro was proudly mocking others for not liking his LLM app making a summary of Mastodon posts without users consent of course. 🤬
Sorry, you cannot view this.
It may have been deleted, or you may not have permission to see it.
17
Replies
4
Boosts
Whenever I read something about "crytpo", I substitute the word "criminal" and it makes it much easier to understand.
I sure great things could be done for the Fediverse with that level of funding though.
Where the money comes from is as important as the amount though.
1
@_elena @lisamelton guess how many millions threads.net has quietly raised from FAANG companies—mostly F tho.
@_elena
"Can you imagine Mastodon raising 100 MILLION dollars from a crypto VC fund..."
Well *I* can imagine it!
@_elena Someone suggested that the vague "and other interactions" very likely means people's DMs and honestly I think they're probably right because "posts, likes, and comments" kind of covers everything else...
And that would be everything since like a year ago — at least.
@_elena I'm pretty sure the WHOLE of the Fedi does not meet 100M costs in 10 years
Combined
1
@_elena@mastodon.social I mean, I won't use BSKY EVER. I'm happy it exists for those that choose to. But we're going to keep seeing this over and over and over again. But I'm also happy because more folks that choose to use other platforms takes power away from Big Tech.
I think things like this show folks that BSKY is NOT the same as Mastodon or the fediverse in general. But I think most won't care and for those that DO care, do they care enough to move AGAIN?
And if they do, we know they won't be going to Twitter. Maybe a few will run their own whatever in the Fediverse or some will be empowered to build something themselves and make it better and AP is the only way to go really imo.
No matter what, thank you ALL for joining us on the #Fediverse because the ABOVE is the ONLY alternative that Capitalism sees and I'm happy to have REAL choice.
This comment is unavailable — it may have been deleted or is not visible to you.
This comment is unavailable — it may have been deleted or is not visible to you.
@_elena @mat reminder, the Bluesky team explicitly mentioned commercial use of their data in their 2024 arXiv preprint:
“…as Bluesky grows, there are likely to be multiple professionally-run indexers for various purposes. For example, a company that performs sentiment analysis on social media activity about brands could easily create a whole-network index that provides insights to their clients. Web search engines can incorporate Bluesky activity into their indexes,…” pg. 5
it’s been part of the model from the start…
2
@UlrikeHahn @_elena how is it different from the fediverse? as long as there's a firehose, anyone can crawl mastodon.social or any other instance and do the same
1
it seems both legally different to me and different in design:
https://write.as/ulrikehahn/bridging-to-bluesky-the-open-social-web-consent-and-gdpr
1
@UlrikeHahn it surely is, but nothing technically prevents anyone to crawl data from https://[any_instance]/public/local automatically. It's even worse on AP because you never really delete a post as it's duplicated on a thousands different instances. Someone already did a firehose of activitypub but I can't remember his @
1
@_elena This is disappointing. I hope the best for BlueSky, but I have a bad feeling this is going to come back to haunt them.
@_elena "Open social infrastructure" - Haha, nice bullshit term.
1
@_elena
How many cats can get for this?
