Ok so I think we are all familiar that schoolgirl outfits, teacher outfits, etc... are very common fetishes. I've seen some commentary that this is another symbol of the rampant sexualisation of minors. But I don't really think this is the case.
Rather, I think that it's because most people had pubescent-hormone-driven fantasies when they were in school, and those were sexually formative experiences.
1/?
Similar thing applies to other aspects of the "teenage" experience, like truth or dare etc...
I think that the desires were important to us during a critical time of mental development, so it's natural that a bit persists. And I think those fantasies to some extent aren't "I want to fuck a schoolgirl" but "what if back then I'd fucked a schoolgirl".
And I think indulging in this in a fictional context with a consenting partner is fine.
2/?
I would further say that I think that this is a bigger contributor to the popularity of anime/manga with fanservice of adolescent characters than pedophilia is.
3/3
@Misofist this makes sense, especially when you consider that teenagers are the target audience, Them and adults in their early 20s who would be proximate to that experience as well
@Misofist yeah, duh!?
@F3715H I have seen people try to moralise about basically every fetish, but I haven't seen a defense of this one before.
@Misofist I mean adults doing roleplay stuff is their freedom, cuz consent is everything.
@F3715H And yet unfortunately leftist spaces have constant conversations about certain forms of roleplay being harmful.
@fluffykittycat @F3715H Yep. I wasn't really a fan of the way that leftists were hating on Belle Delphine because she was "appealing to pedophiles".
@Misofist @fluffykittycat Granted there are many ways to criticise her, being cited by many as core reason why YouTube clamped down hard on nudity and sexually suggestive themes (tho I think that's more of a figleaf rather than admitting reactionary hategroups and advertisers pressuring YouTube!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qbok9Aju0JA&t=1323s
- But I think the claim of her appealing to a certain group is just classic anti-Sexwork hatespeech.
@F3715H @Misofist @fluffykittycat Oh yeah...
Don't even get me started on #AdPocalypse.
I still have €5-ish on my AdSense and no chance to ever get that stolen revenue cashed out, because #YouTube decided in their endless wisdom do do #CollectivePunishment against #SmallChannels that made it the good platform it was.
Which is espechally annoying as I literally followed YouTube's rules to the letter and never even got a single complaint (copyright strike, community strike, or anything else for that matter) on the content I did, as I went out of my way to do original content, enshure anything that I didn't create 100% myself was properly licensed and even documented that (i.e. music useage), because " #FairUse" doesn't exist in #Germany!
Sorry for the rant...
@Misofist @fluffykittycat yeah man...
But back on topic:
https://furry.engineer/@fluffykittycat/116008971677158859
I think that unless one were to put like #OnlyFans links into a Channel that's in the "YouTube Kids" partnering program, but properly age-rated¹ (or better yet, just follow the site rules and not link to that at all!!²) there's not much reason to be pissed at.
¹: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qbok9Aju0JA&t=1425s
²: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qbok9Aju0JA&t=1294s
