#Tag
I mean if Trump is allowed to do this, so should I! #epstein #trump #epsteinfiles #censorship #jobapplication #antifascism #antifa
On the left, an Epstein document the DOJ released in 2024, with Trump’s name and others. It’s still up on the DOJ website. On the right, the same document as DOJ redacted it in response to the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
~ Roger Sollenberger quoted by Greg Dworkin
The document released in 2024, which is still on the DOJ website, is here: https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdf
"They didn’t even release the victim interviews; just pictures of the tapes of the interviews. Think about that. A photograph of a tape cassette.
This would be funny if it wasn’t about a crime involving the rapes of 14-year-old girls. …
The Department of Justice is not only thumbing its nose at the public’s demand for transparency and accountability, it is not taking the crimes committed against children seriously.
~ Julie K. Brown
https://jkbjournalist.substack.com/p/the-epstein-files-my-observations
"The problem with the Justice Department’s modified, limited release of the Jeffrey Epstein files since Friday afternoon isn’t that there have been some mistaken redactions and some mistaken non-redactions. The problem is that the administration has decided simply not to release key documents, like the original victim statements and the 60-count draft indictment of Epstein.
We’re in the midst of a coverup."
~ William Kristol
"CBS said it found at least 550 pages that were entirely redacted in the release, which arrived on Dec. 19, the deadline set by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. ...
CBS said the blackouts extended beyond fully redacted files. It reported that at least 180 completely obscured pages appeared inside files that were otherwise only partly redacted, sometimes following a cover page or other material that was not fully redacted."
~ The Intellectualist
https://www.lincolnsquare.media/p/at-least-550-pages-in-new-epstein
Cuz, ya know, forbid you are fat like #Trump, he’s allowed to be as #gluttonous as he wants, but everyone else has to be visually #fuckable.
#NovoNordisk wins #US [Trump] approval for #weight-loss pill.
Don’t mind the horrible #SideEffects “#MissPiggy” -Trump.
#law #FDA #RFKJR #science#medicine #drugs #conformity #bigotry #discrimination #FatShaming #SocialStigma #harem #whores #objectification #misogyny #MaleSupremacy #Epstein #rape #SexualAssault #RapistInChief
https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/novo-nordisk-wins-us-approval-weight-loss-pill-2025-12-22/?utm_source=braze&utm_medium=notifications&utm_campaign=2025_engagement
Pres. Bill Clinton Spokesman: “Someone or something is being protected. We need no such protection. Produce the full and complete record.”
I mean if Trump is allowed to do this, so should I! #epstein #trump #epsteinfiles #censorship #jobapplication #antifascism #antifa
Pres. Bill Clinton Spokesman: “Someone or something is being protected. We need no such protection. Produce the full and complete record.”
"The problem with the Justice Department’s modified, limited release of the Jeffrey Epstein files since Friday afternoon isn’t that there have been some mistaken redactions and some mistaken non-redactions. The problem is that the administration has decided simply not to release key documents, like the original victim statements and the 60-count draft indictment of Epstein.
We’re in the midst of a coverup."
~ William Kristol
"Here is your reminder that Donald Trump busting the cabal of pedophiles is the entire raison d’être du QAnon! Per Wikipedia:
'Their core belief is that a cabal of Satanic, cannibalistic child molesters in league with the deep state is operating a global child sex trafficking ring and that Donald Trump is secretly leading the fight against them.'"
"The problem with the Justice Department’s modified, limited release of the Jeffrey Epstein files since Friday afternoon isn’t that there have been some mistaken redactions and some mistaken non-redactions. The problem is that the administration has decided simply not to release key documents, like the original victim statements and the 60-count draft indictment of Epstein.
We’re in the midst of a coverup."
~ William Kristol
"They didn’t even release the victim interviews; just pictures of the tapes of the interviews. Think about that. A photograph of a tape cassette.
This would be funny if it wasn’t about a crime involving the rapes of 14-year-old girls. …
The Department of Justice is not only thumbing its nose at the public’s demand for transparency and accountability, it is not taking the crimes committed against children seriously.
~ Julie K. Brown
https://jkbjournalist.substack.com/p/the-epstein-files-my-observations
On the left, an Epstein document the DOJ released in 2024, with Trump’s name and others. It’s still up on the DOJ website. On the right, the same document as DOJ redacted it in response to the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
~ Roger Sollenberger quoted by Greg Dworkin
The document released in 2024, which is still on the DOJ website, is here: https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdf
Nicola Jennings' cartoon commentary on the close ties between Epstein and Trump that Trump is trying to keep covered up.
"[Attorney General Todd] Blanche asserted that the photo was taken down to protect the identity of the victims. [Kristen] Welker [of Meet the Press] astutely asked, 'So the women in the photo with Trump were victims?' Several hours later, the photo was restored online, with an explanation that it did not include any victims."
~ Robert B. Hubbell
https://roberthubbell.substack.com/p/a-weekend-of-pro-democracy-protests
"The episode suggests that the DOJ intended to remove all photos of Trump. When a photo escaped notice of the reviewers, the DOJ retroactively withheld the photo until it was caught in the act of protecting Trump. The DOJ then had no choice but to release the photo—which had already been downloaded hundreds of times."
"[Attorney General Todd] Blanche asserted that the photo was taken down to protect the identity of the victims. [Kristen] Welker [of Meet the Press] astutely asked, 'So the women in the photo with Trump were victims?' Several hours later, the photo was restored online, with an explanation that it did not include any victims."
~ Robert B. Hubbell
https://roberthubbell.substack.com/p/a-weekend-of-pro-democracy-protests
"It also requires that redactions be accompanied by a written justification published in the Federal Register and submitted to Congress. And it calls for a list of government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced in released materials that, under the law’s ban on redactions for political sensitivity, may not be withheld on that basis."
"The law permits limited withholding or redaction in certain circumstances, including to protect victims’ personally identifiable information, to withhold child sexual abuse material, and to temporarily withhold information that would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution if the withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary."
"It also requires that redactions be accompanied by a written justification published in the Federal Register and submitted to Congress. And it calls for a list of government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced in released materials that, under the law’s ban on redactions for political sensitivity, may not be withheld on that basis."
This is a bonfire demo instance for testing purposes
!["Sir, we need to see a five year history of your social media usage"
[Video of a person showing several pages of nothing but black blocks]](https://pixelfed.social/storage/m/_v2/787639063871293561/c19ce1b25-2f8843/010bDp2qjb46/cPURkt6HtM2eHcoZJnsL2yijICRePbXSxAlZHI94.gif)
