Emma Reynolds on #BbcQuestionTime says, "Had he known then what he knows now, he would never have appointed him."
But he DID know then. He said as much at Wednesday's #PMQs when asked by #Badenoch
"Can the official security vetting received mention his friendship with #Epstein?"
"Yes, it did" Starmer replies
Emma Reynolds on #BbcQuestionTime says, "Had he known then what he knows now, he would never have appointed him."
But he DID know then. He said as much at Wednesday's #PMQs when asked by #Badenoch
"Can the official security vetting received mention his friendship with #Epstein?"
"Yes, it did" Starmer replies
"I regret appointing him. If I knew, then what I knew now" KS
Five mins later #BADENOCH asks
"Can the official security vetting received mention his friendship with Epstein?"
"Yes, it did" Starmer replies
He's ....
"I regret appointing him. If I knew, then what I knew now" KS
Five mins later #BADENOCH asks
"Can the official security vetting received mention his friendship with Epstein?"
"Yes, it did" Starmer replies
He's ....
At #PMQs today #Badenoch asked will Labour MPs lose the whip if they vote against the government in respect of her motion to have released ALL DOCUMENTS relating to the appointment of #Mandelson
Starmer says one of the amendments he had put down is some documents are state secrets.
[One could reasonable argue any government document is a state secret]
At #PMQs today #Badenoch asked will Labour MPs lose the whip if they vote against the government in respect of her motion to have released ALL DOCUMENTS relating to the appointment of #Mandelson
Starmer says one of the amendments he had put down is some documents are state secrets.
[One could reasonable argue any government document is a state secret]
