So, please boost this for reach but I need some good banking apps that do good check scanning for blind/low vision users that use Voiceover or Talkback primarily. I'm looking for good verbal prompts for alignment, or front/back notifications or even if it tells you if it is upside down or not. This should apply to phone based apps only and only ones that do this well. Please give me the name and accessibility features of the check scanning bits please. This is work adjacent for me. Thanks!
Needs help 👆
Needs rockets🚀 - steer your post to the eyes needed, no algorithms on mastodon.
#blind #screenReader #bank #app ?
I dont know which. When typing a hashtag, mastodon shows how many times its been used today.
Good luck!
LJ
and 4 others
boosted
What a great story.
Scammers accessed Age pensioner Ian Williams’ debit card details & withdrew $1,338, which is 5.5% of his annual income. He provided proof to his bank (NAB) but they did not accept responsibility or refund his money.
So he sued the bank - on his own, without legal representation - for 5.5% of their annual profit. That’s $379,005,000.
The bank did not respond to the case. He won.
On appeal to the Supreme Court the case was dismissed on technicalities & Mr Williams ordered to pay the bank’s legal costs.
Only after the story was widely publicised did the bank do what they should have done from the start: refund Mr Williams’ $1,338 & offer him an apology. They also waived their claim to costs.
Dragged kicking & screaming to basic ethical business practice. It’s a good look, NAB. We see you.
The Doctor
boosted
When your #bank sends you a CSV of your transactions, one of the columns should be a unique transaction identifier (e.g. UUID).
That way, your #accounting software won't record a duplicate transaction even if you get the CSV time frame wrong.
Thoughts?
When your #bank sends you a CSV of your transactions, one of the columns should be a unique transaction identifier (e.g. UUID).
That way, your #accounting software won't record a duplicate transaction even if you get the CSV time frame wrong.
Thoughts?
What a great story.
Scammers accessed Age pensioner Ian Williams’ debit card details & withdrew $1,338, which is 5.5% of his annual income. He provided proof to his bank (NAB) but they did not accept responsibility or refund his money.
So he sued the bank - on his own, without legal representation - for 5.5% of their annual profit. That’s $379,005,000.
The bank did not respond to the case. He won.
On appeal to the Supreme Court the case was dismissed on technicalities & Mr Williams ordered to pay the bank’s legal costs.
Only after the story was widely publicised did the bank do what they should have done from the start: refund Mr Williams’ $1,338 & offer him an apology. They also waived their claim to costs.
Dragged kicking & screaming to basic ethical business practice. It’s a good look, NAB. We see you.