Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • About Bonfire
Proto Himbo Derpopean
@guyjantic@infosec.exchange  ·  activity timestamp 20 hours ago

I did a poll here for a week. 141 people responded. I was interested in #mastodon users' preferred categorization of the term "neurodiverse." The results generally confirmed my a priori predictions but had some surprises. Some takeaways for me, right now:

  • Autism was in a tie for top position, unsurprising as, in my experience, autism was the first condition to be labeled "neurodiverse" or "neuroatypical", and is, I suspect, something of a prototype for the category.
  • ADHD was tied (given the sample) with autism. I was mildly surprised. I think a few years ago this would not have been the case; ADHD awareness, activism, and acceptance have increased dramatically over the past few years.
  • Schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, and #bipolar disorders were the next group. The inclusion of anxiety disorders surprised me; I suspected it would be tied with depression disorders.
  • Personality disorders being endorsed at the same rate as depression and intellectual disability was a mild surprise.
  • Psychopathy being tied with depression and intellectual disability was a pretty big surprise for me. This poll was largely about opinions and preferences, so stigma is (IMO) a big part of it. "Being a psychohpath" seems to be less stigmatized (in a specific way) than I thought... it's also possible the results would change if I'd used the word "psychopath" instead of "psychopathy."
  • Intellectual disabiity (until pretty recently labeled "mental retardation" but, you know, the euphemism treadmill) was a wild card for me; I didn't know where it would end up. I would like to do a different survey sometime, with a different response format, so I could see the variability in responses. I suspect this condition (and a few others) would result in a lot of variability.
  • Pedophilia was of particular interest to me. The results confirmed my strong a priori hypothesis, and this (plus psychopathy) was a major reason for wording the poll as I did, prompoting for preferences instead of a more objective assessment of the research-based fitness of each condition for the "neurodiverse" category.

More about #pedophilia: a nice, big mountain of research strongly suggests that it is a condition of altered brain development; in fact, it is probably a sexual orientation. A better survey than this simple poll might assess participants' understanding of pedophilia in addition to the question I did ask. I suspect many people confuse pedophilia with child molestation/abuse (nb: pedophilia is a pattern of attraction, not a set of behaviors, though many pedophiles have also abused children).

Both the left and right political meta-groups in the USA have latched onto "pedophile" as a label for child molestation--usually of post-pubescent children, where pedophilia is very specifically a pattern of attraction to prepubescent children. There was flirtation during Trump's first term with the more correct(ish) labels "hebephilia" and "ephebephilia", but I think the need for a stronger, more dehumanizing label won in the end, and "pedophile" packs a bigger cultural/emotional punch than "child molester."

Anyway, thanks to everyone who participated. This is fascinating enough for me that I might even do a real survey sometime. If I can get my dean to stop giving me extra classes for calling him out on his anti-labor nonsense.

Notes:

  1. I phrased the question as *Which of the following conditions do you personally think should be included under the #neurodiversity umbrella? * instead of asking which conditions would be classified as neurodiverse, etc. for reasons noted above.
  2. I chose "neurodiverse" instead of "neuroatypical", believing that the latter would produce more restricted categorization.
  3. This is not (I hope) research according to federal definitions. It's a demonstration of a concept and I won't be trying to disseminate these results in scientific journals or at science conferences.

#neurodiverse #neuroatypical #poll #adhd #autism #schizophrenia #anxiety #bipolar #PersonalityDisorder #psychopathy #depression #IntellectualDisability

SpringerLink

Is Pedophilia a Sexual Orientation? - Archives of Sexual Behavior

In this article, I address the question of whether pedophilia in men can be construed as a male sexual orientation, and the implications for thinking of it in this way for scientific research, clinical practice, and public policy. I begin by defining pedophilia and sexual orientation, and then compare pedophilia (as a potential sexual orientation with regard to age) to sexual orientations with regard to gender (heterosexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality), on the bases of age of onset, correlations with sexual and romantic behavior, and stability over time. I conclude with comments about the potential social and legal implications of conceptualizing pedophilia as a type of sexual orientation in males.
This is a graph, so it is difficult to summarize. The main findings are noted in the post, and here are the data as (I hope) a readable table. The first numerical column is the percentage of respondents who endorsed the condition in that row. The next two numerical columns are the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval for that value.

condition                 Percent  I_lower CI_upper
---------------------------------------------------
Pedophilia                     3.7     0.6     6.8
Intellectual_Disability       40.7    32.6    48.8
Depression                    40.7    32.6    48.8
Psychopath                    40.7    32.6    48.8
Personality_Disorders         44.4    36.2    52.6
Bipolar_Disorders             51.9    43.7    60.1
Anxiety                       55.6    47.4    63.8
Schizophrenia_Psychosis       55.6    47.4    63.8
Autism                        92.6    88.3    96.9
ADHD                          96.3    93.2    99.4
This is a graph, so it is difficult to summarize. The main findings are noted in the post, and here are the data as (I hope) a readable table. The first numerical column is the percentage of respondents who endorsed the condition in that row. The next two numerical columns are the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval for that value. condition Percent I_lower CI_upper --------------------------------------------------- Pedophilia 3.7 0.6 6.8 Intellectual_Disability 40.7 32.6 48.8 Depression 40.7 32.6 48.8 Psychopath 40.7 32.6 48.8 Personality_Disorders 44.4 36.2 52.6 Bipolar_Disorders 51.9 43.7 60.1 Anxiety 55.6 47.4 63.8 Schizophrenia_Psychosis 55.6 47.4 63.8 Autism 92.6 88.3 96.9 ADHD 96.3 93.2 99.4
This is a graph, so it is difficult to summarize. The main findings are noted in the post, and here are the data as (I hope) a readable table. The first numerical column is the percentage of respondents who endorsed the condition in that row. The next two numerical columns are the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval for that value. condition Percent I_lower CI_upper --------------------------------------------------- Pedophilia 3.7 0.6 6.8 Intellectual_Disability 40.7 32.6 48.8 Depression 40.7 32.6 48.8 Psychopath 40.7 32.6 48.8 Personality_Disorders 44.4 36.2 52.6 Bipolar_Disorders 51.9 43.7 60.1 Anxiety 55.6 47.4 63.8 Schizophrenia_Psychosis 55.6 47.4 63.8 Autism 92.6 88.3 96.9 ADHD 96.3 93.2 99.4
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Log in

BT Free Social

BT Free is a non-profit organization founded by @ozoned@btfree.social . It's goal is for digital privacy rights, advocacy and consulting. This goal will be attained by hosting open platforms to allow others to seamlessly join the Fediverse on moderated instances or by helping others join the Fediverse.

BT Free Social: About · Code of conduct · Privacy ·
Bonfire community · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Public Groups
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login